Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 9058 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2002 22:56:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2002 22:56:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 27173 invoked by uid 97); 11 Mar 2002 22:56:21 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27144 invoked by uid 97); 11 Mar 2002 22:56:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 27133 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2002 22:56:20 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:56:18 -0800 From: Brian Goetz To: Lucene Developers List Subject: Re: Normalization Message-ID: <20020311145618.A5821@lx.quiotix.com> References: <007b01c1c93f$930bc7f0$0600a8c0@spaghetti> <20020311131446.E4382@lx.quiotix.com> <00cf01c1c948$208eeaf0$0600a8c0@spaghetti> <3C8D34D2.8080305@earthlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3C8D34D2.8080305@earthlink.net>; from dmitrys@earthlink.net on Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 03:50:58PM -0700 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Isn't this really a property of an index rather then an entire Lucene > build? Technically no, but in spirit, yes. Personally, I always liked the idea of creating an Analyzer at index creation time, and having the Analyzer object stored as a serialized object in the index. Then you couldn't make the all-too-common mistake of indexing with one and then trying to search with another. > If so, having a text-based way to describe a policy is very helpful > and better than a source code-based one. yup. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: