Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 58361 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2002 22:28:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Feb 2002 22:28:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 13971 invoked by uid 97); 20 Feb 2002 22:28:51 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 13949 invoked by uid 97); 20 Feb 2002 22:28:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 13938 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2002 22:28:50 -0000 Errors-To: User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1331 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:28:48 -0800 Subject: Code freeze for Lucene and release RC6? From: Peter Carlson To: Lucene Developers List Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <94F890AC98E9AF478F08FEFAC7467C7C010F6A@riker01> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi all, What do you think about a code freeze for 1 week after RC6 is released to validate RC6 and have 1.2 go into release if all is good? How about March 1 for a goal for the final release? Assuming RC6 comes out this week. Thought? --Peter -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: