Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 37146 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2002 17:49:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jan 2002 17:49:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 7052 invoked by uid 97); 21 Jan 2002 17:46:10 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 7019 invoked by uid 97); 21 Jan 2002 17:46:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 6982 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2002 17:46:09 -0000 Message-ID: <4BC270C6AB8AD411AD0B00B0D0493DF0EE7E5A@mail.grandcentral.com> From: Doug Cutting To: 'Lucene Developers List' Subject: RE: JDK 1.1 vs 1.2 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 09:42:45 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:acoliver@nc.rr.com] > > Regarding this, are there any thoughts on when it would make sense to > move to Java 2? The lucene-user list might be a better place to make this query. The last time I polled there were several folks still using Lucene in JDK 1.1. In any case, I'd like to get a 1.2 final release out before we make this change. The query parser was broken for a while, but now that it seems to be fixed I think we're about ready to really make a 1.2 final release. Doug -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: