From lucene-dev-return-559-qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-dev=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Thu Jan 24 21:32:02 2002 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-lucene-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 87875 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2002 21:32:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2002 21:32:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 20429 invoked by uid 97); 24 Jan 2002 21:31:48 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20376 invoked by uid 97); 24 Jan 2002 21:31:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Lucene Developers List" Reply-To: "Lucene Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20354 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2002 21:31:46 -0000 Subject: RE: Getting Started (first draft comments) From: "Andrew C. Oliver" To: 'Lucene Developers List' In-Reply-To: <4BC270C6AB8AD411AD0B00B0D0493DF0EE7E8D@mail.grandcentral.com> References: <4BC270C6AB8AD411AD0B00B0D0493DF0EE7E8D@mail.grandcentral.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.0.99+cvs.2001.12.18.08.57 (Preview Release) Date: 24 Jan 2002 16:22:53 -0500 Message-Id: <1011907373.5256.2555.camel@linux2.superlinksoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I don't feel particularly strongly about this either... I guess I prefer to at least provide docs in XML/HTML format and anything in addition is bonus. (just most people feel more "comfortable" reading that format in my experience...being a shell guy I'd rather read the text...but there are fewer like me or everyone would just run Linux ;-) ) -Andy On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 16:24, Doug Cutting wrote: > > From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:acoliver@apache.org] > > > > On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 16:00, Doug Cutting wrote: > > > Currently information on how to build Lucene is in the > > > BUILD.txt file [...] Is this inaccurate or inadequate? > > > > Its good. I just think the "for dummies" version is also > > appropriate in addition to not instead of. > > I worry a little about having the same information maintained in two places. > If the build procedure changes, will both get updated in a timely manner? > Maybe, maybe not. Mind you, I don't feel all that strongly about this. > > Doug > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail: > -- www.superlinksoftware.com www.sourceforge.net/projects/poi - port of Excel format to java http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4487555.html - fix java generics! The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote. -Ambassador Kosh -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: