Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 84622 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2001 22:23:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO snapper-qfe0) (195.66.15.141) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Oct 2001 22:23:25 -0000 Received: from qn-212-58-175-209.quicknet.nl ([212.58.175.209]:64948 "HELO orca") by snapper.soneraplaza.nl with SMTP id ; Thu, 11 Oct 2001 00:23:06 +0200 Message-ID: <028301c151da$07544c50$0401a8c0@orca> From: "Maurits van Wijland" To: References: <4BC270C6AB8AD411AD0B00B0D0493DF0EE7C57@mail.grandcentral.com> Subject: Re: Dutch Stemmer Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 00:22:06 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Doug, I will add comments to the code and reduce the number of public classes. Maurits. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Cutting" To: Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 7:37 PM Subject: RE: Dutch Stemmer > This looks good. It is low-risk, since it changes no existing classes, > adding new classes in a new package. It looks as though you've implemented > the right things (a stemming filter, and an analyzer that plugs this > together with a stop list and tokenizer). I don't speak Dutch, so I cannot > assess the quality of these. > > My concerns before this is checked in are that: > 1. It compiles. I have not tested this yet, and we don't want to break > the build. > 2. More Javadoc is added. My rule of thumb is that there should be no > empty boxes in the generated javadoc, i.e., every publicly visible class, > method and field must be documented. Also, every package should have a > package.html with at least a one-line description of what is in the package. > 3. Fewer classes and methods are public. Do the Rule, RuleVector and > DutchStemmer classes need to be public? Probably little more than the core > classes (DutchStemFilter DutchAnalyzer) need to be public. > > Doug > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Maurits van Wijland [mailto:m.vanwijland@quicknet.nl] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 12:48 AM > > To: lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org > > Cc: joanne.sproston@teamware.co.uk; Doug Cutting > > Subject: Dutch Stemmer > > > > > > Doug, > > > > Here is my first version of the dutch stemmer. > > Doug could you have a look at this? > > > > kind regards, > > > > Maurits > > > > > > >