lucene-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dmitry Serebrennikov <dmit...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: feature suggestion
Date Sat, 13 Oct 2001 19:36:49 GMT


Frank Nestel wrote:

>Yes, I would prefer to have native Object support. It's
>not that I do not know how to wrap arround that, it is
>just that I thought this would be a nice and lean extension of
>the Lucene API without loosing the primary focus of Lucene.
>
>To make this really lean in terms of generated index size
>I guess it would be better to have those serialized Objects
>stored as byte[] rather than String?
>
Not only that, but I think they are required to be byte[]s because of 
the separation between Java characters treams (which are modified by 
character encoding in effect) and data streams that are pure bytes.


Mime
View raw message