logging-log4net-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yaron Berlinsky <Yaron.Berlin...@qcore.com>
Subject RE: unintended usage of the same configuration file
Date Tue, 13 Oct 2015 03:44:42 GMT
I am trying to get off this distribution list, but unabe  to do so when following the unsubscribe

Can anyone help?

Sent from Samsung Mobile

-------- Original message --------
From: Piers Williams
Date:13/10/2015 01:48 (GMT+02:00)
To: Log4NET User
Subject: RE: unintended usage of the same configuration file


The AdoNetAppender is *already* a buffering appender, with a default batch size of (I think)
100 for performance reasons as you suggest (both for the sake of your app and the poor database

Buffering does mean however that if your app tanks you probably lose the log message that
let you know why, hence again value of (synchronous) file logging.

On 12 Oct 2015 10:47 pm, "Nicholas Duane" <nickdu@msn.com<mailto:nickdu@msn.com>>
I would agree that file based logging it core.  I would probably not want my web application
logging to a database, for sure not each log statement.  If there was some buffering in between
which batched the logs and then sent every once in a while to the DB that would seem better,
to me at least.  If I needed the logs in a database I would still probably write to a local
file and then figure a way to get the files to a central location where they could be loaded
into the database.

To: dpsenner@gmail.com<mailto:dpsenner@gmail.com>; log4net-user@logging.apache.org<mailto:log4net-user@logging.apache.org>
From: piers.williams@gmail.com<mailto:piers.williams@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: unintended usage of the same configuration file
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 22:27:44 +0800

Dominic: I’m afraid I don’t agree with any of what you said. File based logging is a critical
part of any instrumentation strategy – it’s way faster than logging to a (typically remote)
database, and gives you somewhere to log the errors when the database is down. That’s assuming
you have a database at all of course – not all web applications even have one (though I’d
concede that’s rare).

It’s true that web applications will typically have limited write access to local disks,
and that’s entirely appropriate, but they always have some write permissions somewhere –
even if it’s only to Temp. Establishing a location with write permissions for logs hardly
entails ‘punching holes in permissions’.

Finally, as best I can tell, none of this is relevant to the OP’s actual issue, which would
be just the same whether he was logging to file or to database, because it’s a configuration

From: Dominik Psenner
Sent: Sunday, 11 October 2015 2:35 PM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: unintended usage of the same configuration file

The concept behind how web applications work makes it hard to use file appenders. A web application
should not access a filesystem directly and punching holes into permissions may not be advisable.
If i had to work out a web app i would log to the database that the web application will require

On 11 Oct 2015 4:26 a.m., "tasos" <tasoss@gmail.com<mailto:tasoss@gmail.com>>

I'm working on a .net application and i have used this guidance http://haacked.com/archive/2005/03/07/ConfiguringLog4NetForWebApplications.aspx/<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/1jWVIe4xAe6jqb333xEVKztwTsSztUQsLELLCzBASztUQsLELzAQjqdTzhO-y--qem3qdTzhO-CyqerLCOSNH3y7NfB2xkI2xqRo_OVImJmfYKr747Cr8KfZvASnD7bIZuVtdCUXC1PBQT7eEyemKCHtBcSyrjdTV555MQsLe8FTdTdw0OuXoHW7bVIr4V6vNeZTYKPBNS2loeO8JNB0y5qAm0pYNuIg5Yw8bb7OJIVlxjwu7UrfGho1FtKDNbN-rso5T4NOpsJIqMUxYjVgElb72RGN_BMkvkyhB0zSHroD_00jqb9EVvpdwIqid43s9gDY4fgd43td8-q8aKCy2pfPh1jlvd45GMtAhrzIVlwq87p7-rvhdMODvjxM->
There is a project on which i have added in the assemblyinfo.cs
[assembly: log4net.Config.XmlConfigurator(ConfigFile = "foo1.config", Watch = true)]
and in another one(different assembly)
[assembly: log4net.Config.XmlConfigurator(ConfigFile = "foo2.config", Watch = true)]
My configurations are like this http://pastebin.com/UpSpwMHH<http://cp.mcafee.com/d/FZsS81MQ76Qm6673hPt6X1KVJ6XNEVvhvvd7b9J6XNEVvhv79ECQrL6zBZ5ZYQsI6QrL6zBZd4QsTvdBJzm74fyva52Fo52RGN_BPoJqIvVsSe8fcShsvW_9ILeenpWZOWrdNTc3DbFKeth4sJtdmXapJcSCrLOaabxEVushjKrKr01HrivA9gVv0CIcb61IbxsSvkyM3iXtfynzYSUMbK9zAOVroRxN3UDOxgGme5Hlz_bwE-F4za17JmSNf-00CQmjhO-Or1oQAq86UixfU8uwq86WqhYQgltd44OvCy2CG-q8blwX8yT7pOH0QgeOfYS-yrWUUiQIbr>
except the different output filenames
(<param name="File" value="foofilename.log"/> )
The problem is that the assembly that uses foo1.config writes on the output
file of the file that is configured in foo2.config.
In each class i use log4net i declare as the guidance site(mentioned above) says:

private static readonly ILog Log = LogManager.GetLogger(MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod().DeclaringType);

Thank you in advance for your help!

View raw message