logging-log4net-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com>
Subject RE: Why is log4net not more similar to log4j(2)?
Date Fri, 18 Sep 2015 14:32:38 GMT
I looked over the thread you included below.  I can't tell from that whether the suggestion
was to port log4j2.  Not sure if the comment about starting log4net 2.0 "from scratch" is
an indication of having it be a port of log4j2.

In my mind the biggest benefit would be to have the same architecture/feature set running
on both linux and windows.  Of course it would also be great if the releases were synchronized.
 I know a big gripe of log4net is that it's not getting rev'd.

I would be interested in helping if the goal is to bring log4net in sync with log4j2.  And
by this I guess I mean port as that would seem the easiest and safest path to the goal.

I haven't worked on any open source project in the past.  I'm curious, how does this work?
 Who's coordinating and making the decisions?

Thanks,
Nick

> From: bodewig@apache.org
> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org; log4net-user@logging.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Why is log4net not more similar to log4j(2)?
> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:25:00 +0200
> 
> On 2015-09-17, Gary Gregory wrote:
> 
> > "Patches welcome" is my motto :-)
> 
> > Gary
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Nicholas Duane <nickdu@msn.com> wrote:
> 
> >> Sending to both the log4j and log4net mailing lists.
> 
> >> I'm curious why log4net is not more similar to log4j(2)?  Is it because
> >> there is less development work being done on log4net and log4j had
> >> significant changes in the 2.0 version?
> 
> > I think I read somewhere that log4net was a port of log4j 1.
> 
> This is certainly part of the reason.  log4net was started as a port of
> 1.x a long time ago.  The developers (long before I joined) added some
> deviations that look closer to what log4j 2 is doing (XML
> configuration).
> 
> Incidently Dominik started a discussion about log4net 2.0 on the dev
> list[1] and some people expressed interest.  Any hand that can offer
> some help is more than welcome, so please come over and join.
> 
> [1] thread starting with http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/logging-log4net-dev/201508.mbox/%3C03be01d0da4f%24a85aaa10%24f90ffe30%24%40apache.org%3E
> 
> Stefan
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
> 
 		 	   		  
Mime
View raw message