logging-log4net-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Hollywood" <hollyw...@thzero.com>
Subject Re: Configuration of Levels
Date Wed, 06 Jul 2005 17:50:05 GMT
a) That was an example
b) Just because you can not think of a reason to do something, does not mean 
someone else does not have requirements to do just that.

"Mixing" up the values is not a solid solution, it is just a plain hack. 
Not to mention, definetly a nightmare for future maintainers of the 
codebase.

This question was asked specifically because Niko, awhile back, mentioned 
that the re-ordering of the logging levels was something that was being 
looked at.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Grabowski" <rongrabowski@yahoo.com>
To: "Log4NET User" <log4net-user@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: Configuration of Levels


>I can't think of a good reason why someone would want to make WARN more
> serious than FATAL. Wouldn't that make it difficult for future
> maintainers?
>
> Perhaps you could write your own Logger implementation and have it
> internally mix-up values as you see fit:
>
> DEBUG -> DEBUG
> WARN -> INFO
> ERROR -> WARN
> FATAL -> ERROR
> INFO -> FATAL
>
> --- Hollywood <hollywood@thzero.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll clarify my original question:
>>
>>  Has the configuration of logging Levels ORDER been implemented yet
>> or is it
>> still static, i.e. being able to say that the logging level is
>> VERBOSE,
>> DEBUG, WARN, ERROR, FATAL, TRACE, INFO rather that what has been
>> hardcoded
>> into the log4* system?
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Ron Grabowski" <rongrabowski@yahoo.com>
>> To: "Log4NET User" <log4net-user@logging.apache.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:18 AM
>> Subject: Re: Configuration of Levels
>>
>>
>> > There has been example code in CVS since January 2004:
>> >
>> > http://tinyurl.com/9atgc
>> >
>>
> http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/logging-log4net/examples/net/1.0/Extensibility/TraceLogApp/cs/src/TraceLogApp.cs?rev=1.3&view=log
>> >
>> > I think it was possible with 1.2.0 beta 8 which means its existed
>> since
>> > at least 2003.
>> >
>> > --- Hollywood <hollywood@thzero.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Has the configuration of logging Levels been implemented yet? Or
>> is
>> >> it still
>> >> static?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> 


Mime
View raw message