logging-log4net-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release log4net 2.0.6 based on RC1
Date Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:10:43 GMT
On 2016-12-22, Dominik Psenner wrote:

> Gotcha at http://stefan.samaflost.de/staging/log4net-2.0.6/license.html

> {quote}

>  Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]


> {quote

> We should replace the placeholders.

No, we should not, this is how it is supposed to be. This is inside the
appendix about how anybody can apply the license to their own work
(which wouldn't be copyright by the ASF and probably use different years
from log4net). See also http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

Stefan


> On 2016-12-20 11:07, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Hi all

>> log4net 2.0.6 RC1 is available for review here:
>>    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net
>>    (revision 17495)

>> Details of changes since 1.2.15 are in the release notes:
>>    http://stefan.samaflost.de/staging/log4net-2.0.6/release/release-notes.html

>> I have tested this with Mono and several .NET frameworks using NAnt.

>> The tag is here:
>>    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/2.0.6RC1
>>    (revision 1775236)

>> Site:
>>    http://stefan.samaflost.de/staging/log4net-2.0.6/

>> RAT Report:
>>    http://stefan.samaflost.de/staging/log4net-2.0.6/rat-report.html

>> Nuget Package:
>>    https://www.myget.org/feed/log4net-test/package/nuget/log4net

>> Votes, please.  This vote will close in 72 hours, 1000 GMT 24-Dec 2016

>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>> [ ] +0 OK, but...
>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...

>> Thanks!


Mime
View raw message