logging-log4net-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Towards 2.0.6
Date Sun, 06 Nov 2016 15:53:16 GMT
So this would be something you'd like to see adressed before the
release, right?

I think this is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-485 which
is linked by https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-506 - only
the later is still open.

And there is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-487

LOG4NET-485 is resolved with fix version 1.2.14 and the correspondig
commit (svn revision 1711838) really is part of 1.2.14.

https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14/src/Appender/RollingFileAppender.cs?r1=1707180&r2=1711838

Stefan

On 2016-11-06, Dominik Psenner wrote:

> We had introduced a mutex to secure rolling operations in the rolling file
> appender. It would be nice if we could make the rolling locking
> configurable (none, lock, mutex), defaulting to none. There should be an
> issue for that, too.

> On 6 Nov 2016 2:19 p.m., "Joe" <JocularJoe@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I just had a quick look through the commits since 1.2.15 and I don't see
> anything that looks particularly risky.
> I'd vote for cutting an RC.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
> Sent: 06 November 2016 11:14
> To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
> Subject: Towards 2.0.6

> Hi all

> I'd like to get 2.0.6 released in order to help out people who want to use
> log4net with .NET Core.

> We've had some changes since I built the last test assemblies, but AFAIK
> nobody has given them a try anyway. I wonder whether creating test
> assemblies is worth the effort or whether I should simply proceed with
> cutting a release candidate and call for a vote.

> So what do you think, should I just cut an RC? Is there anything floating
> around that should go into 2.0.6?

> Stefan

Mime
View raw message