Mailing-List: contact log4net-dev-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Log4NET Dev" <log4net-dev@logging.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Informational Version (was Re: Things to do before the next
 release)
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
References: <87y42u8rdg.fsf@v45346.1blu.de> <87poo68px2.fsf@v45346.1blu.de>
From: Dominik Psenner <dpsenner@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ef7dc669-97d3-6290-f6fb-bbafc886d0b0@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:36:25 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87poo68px2.fsf@v45346.1blu.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
archived-at: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:36:31 -0000

That does not work and you must set a second 
AssemblyInformationalVersionAttribute where only a string can be 
specified. It is something that can live along with the 
AssemblyVersionAttribute and specify additional information about the 
assembly. I generally use this approach to include git/hg changeset 
hashes of a build or more verbose information that usually doesnt fit 
into the version numbering scheme.

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.reflection.assemblyinformationalversionattribute(v=vs.110).aspx


On 2016-09-14 17:24, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2016-09-14, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> * decide on the version. I propose to use 2.0.6.0 for the next release
>>    for all artifacts and try getting the "informational version" right -
>>    this is Dominik's second proposal in https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/42a97e0190fde4d5c54700965624c35158569b85cba48facea5ed70f@%3Clog4net-dev.logging.apache.org%3E
> Unfortunately I Can't do this via assembly attributes:
>
> [csc] error CS1607: Warning as Error: Assembly generation -- The version '1.2.15.0-.NET 3.5' specified for the 'product version' is not in the normal 'major.minor.build.revision' format
>
> unless we suppress the warning, that is.
>
> Stefan