Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77927200B6B for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 16:03:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 762BC160AC2; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E41CF160AB6 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 16:03:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 39958 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2016 14:03:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact log4net-dev-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: "Log4NET Dev" List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list log4net-dev@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 39948 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2016 14:03:44 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 14:03:44 +0000 Received: from v45346.1blu.de (v45346.1blu.de [178.254.23.72]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 96E231A0313 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 14:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by v45346.1blu.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AAF2740000A; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 16:03:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefan Bodewig To: Log4NET Dev Subject: Re: Happy to help References: <87twdp66r3.fsf@v45346.1blu.de> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 16:03:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Ryan Boggs's message of "Thu, 8 Sep 2016 21:30:57 -0700") Message-ID: <87eg4tjhkz.fsf@v45346.1blu.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain archived-at: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 14:03:46 -0000 On 2016-09-09, Ryan Boggs wrote: > On Sep 8, 2016 9:23 PM, "Stefan Bodewig" wrote: >> It feels like this is only a short term solution as NAnt is becoming >> more of an obstacle than help by not supporting recent frameworks >> anymore. So I expect we'll start discussing alternative solutions >> soonish. > If people wanna help get NAnt up to speed with the framework support, it > would be appreciated. I hit a wall with it. Ryan, I really appreciate NAnt and your work on it - and I think you know that. It has helped us tremendously. What I said wasn't intended as a slant against NAnt. I wish I had time to contribute to NAnt, but you see yourself how little I manage to contribute to log4net. Stefan