logging-log4net-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Nightly builds
Date Wed, 06 Mar 2013 12:38:39 GMT

(sorry for topposting).

Oh I see. Well yes, it might be difficult then and as we are low on
log4net human power, we better use our efforts on other areas.

I was just looking if drone.io does support .net builds, but it
doesn't seem like that. Maybe there is another provider who can create
nightlies from public directories.

Cheers + thanks for the update!

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Dominik Psenner <dpsenner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Christian,
> [moving this to log4net-dev only]
> According to Stefan we cannot use Gump for nightly builds but should rather set up jenkins.
Therefore I read through [1] and it
> seems that there's at least one major issue with Jenkins: the jenkins slaves do not include
an installation of nant. This requires
> us to move to ant (unfeasible) or discuss with the jenkins admins to set up nant.
> I am not an expert on neither jenkins nore nant and there are probably a lot more culprits
ahead. Therefore I believe that nightlies
> come with quite a lot of work and maybe that work is not worth the effort if there's
not much interest in the community anyway.
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/general/Jenkins?action=show&redirect=Hudson
> Cheers,
> D.
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobmeier@gmail.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 1:08 PM
>>To: Log4NET Dev
>>Cc: Log4NET User
>>Subject: Re: Nightly builds
>>is it a big problem to enable nightlies? I mean, if it is not, why do
>>we hesitate?  Maybe the build attract a few more people to contribute,
>>because they can use their changes pretty much in an instant.
>>Personally I like nightly builds. I am not a .net user, so I have no
>>opinion in this specific case, but in general I like them.
>>My 2 cents -
>>On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Dominik Psenner <dpsenner@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi there,
>>> the poll ended some hour ago and I wanted to give it a little more time. But
unfortunately that
>>did not help and only a few people
>>> participated. Even though 2 ouf of 4 people who shared their opinion are interested
in nightly
>>builds, there does not seem to be
>>> enough interest in the community to pursue this idea.
>>> Cheers,
>>> D.


View raw message