logging-log4net-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Roy Chastain" <...@roychastain.org>
Subject RE: Name for MutexLock?
Date Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:41:38 GMT
lease/faq.xml> looks good with the exception of ") and has also be paid
for by a loss in performance."

May I suggest a rewording of ".  The acquisition and release of a Mutex
for every log entry to be written will result in a loss of performance,
but the Mutex is preferable to the use of MinimalLock."

Are you seriously suggesting that we allow the use of a Mutex lock in
the new RFA?

Roy Chastain

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 07:30
To: log4net-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: Re: Name for MutexLock?

On 2011-09-13, Roy Chastain wrote:

> I like InterProcessLock and would like to propose MultiProcessLock as 
> my favorite.

InterProcessLock it is.

> I HOPE that the documentation will indicate what a bad plan this is 
> and that a remoteing appender etc might be a better plan.

Please take a look at the re-worded FAQ entry in


View raw message