logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Editable File Log File Permissions
Date Sat, 12 Nov 2016 05:12:04 GMT
Ok, cool.

Gary

On Nov 11, 2016 9:10 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" <dimatos@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Gary,
> We are using Log4j2, I thought to take it to the mail list before a opening
> a JIRA. I will open a JIRA for this.
> Thank you ,
>
> On Friday, November 11, 2016, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Which version of Log4j are you using?
> >
> > Bugzilla is no longer used and we no longer support adding to Log4j 1.
> >
> > For Log4j 2 patches and requests, please use Jira.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Gary
> >
> > On Nov 11, 2016 8:18 PM, "Demetrios Dimatos" <dimatos@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello All,
> > > We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able to
> configure
> > > the permissions log files are created with. We don't want to rely on
> > UMASK
> > > because we have managed services who's process should generate logs
> with
> > a
> > > 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640 because
> > the
> > > logs may contain sensitive information.
> > >
> > > We are able to make the modification and set this in the properties
> file.
> > > Now we are looking to see what the community position would be on
> > accepting
> > > such a patch, we don't want to be patching our own distribution.
> > >
> > > I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any matching
> > requirements
> > > recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
> > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message