Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-logging-log4j-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D83DE185A0 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83496 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2016 22:12:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-user-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 83440 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2016 22:12:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Log4J Users List" Reply-To: "Log4J Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list log4j-user@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 83429 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2016 22:12:06 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:12:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BE6B21804C9 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:12:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.898 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.898 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CaRu5JBN-WkX for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 80C9B429C4 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 22:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id bc4so57452864lbc.2 for ; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:12:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=M6T8k/eBfL99w8EYtgCyYc129vNgX4c4eI7GcrsPeIk=; b=yU1WNPyQ/n7f5pz4A1YnYhuMXbUCWWw8CpxMw2gEtuM8Rrzdsc7F5a5vrfCateWWs7 +zK5YG4KzLo7AhYwDE1Muv+hZwKEKmDKZQ6S3P2uObfqR+lY5TFiIQVkbhE41B3HpKjP tNV0f8291iedoOESTPsPtH30x8ppwwm8sugqAL84pcqMQqkUtvU7ggHlwlXUFea92Qgw uhdbcWkNWWvxm+sGlvrUGbF/35F0uV3mVzuTqIArZG64OJiLYMcE/qMYO7PZYgaCXJTb mI8Xf0K0FPI3Qay5aHBnZN2pUftQiVRu2Ht5T4ZpM44z6i1PPELW6LFrB1uB39uJOrh2 ZfIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=M6T8k/eBfL99w8EYtgCyYc129vNgX4c4eI7GcrsPeIk=; b=B7QnUvDeSeB+GEQaFwnst4zvHE3u3q1gg9/R1/mE/e7eH8wf9DH/QhYz226YCTOxTC aIrQCOPJxpn5Cv6NUxd1ttw3Qx9Q3PReEUKRxjILsmnSOujliKLu3JVuwADKDS5AeXbi p9uIJSA8PUCN4q3NRYv6jNSbqNsPfRi4zzUbTWyvc3PUdzFMqxSm4rEwheF7FMngo3oI pHOb9O1rWMUVl+TBpCjZ+F6DbuTXRDuSMqclBPD104Z5qGSxF3Q1J2LOXxJ2GHaoUZF/ TaIg2uIJVPCqquLhoiB01uvtliG2HWQt8TgDaleeQlvOD33elUKVyWFbtAuAbpmtnuj0 /nFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSqPoBrHiYLX0ZBMr5eQQVZaqiqQpz3CB0Q4rqxf69TB2fjxVi2zekrBoj23jimrU3k7ki5cn3hdZjmfA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.63.161 with SMTP id h1mr3610009lbs.61.1453587117585; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:11:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.200.201 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:11:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.200.201 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:11:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:11:57 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Easy way to use TCP instead of UDP in SyslogAppender in log4j 1.2.17 From: Gary Gregory To: Log4J Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3fe1ecb404a052a079f4b --001a11c3fe1ecb404a052a079f4b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 "It's just a small matter of programming" a friend of mine used to say. Joking aside, I would do all I can to move to Log4j 2 as version 1 is EOL. I personally do not have the time to help on version 1 and 2, so I focus on 2. Gary Gary On Jan 21, 2016 6:01 AM, "Apostolis Giannakidis" wrote: > To my understanding log4j 1.2.17 supports only UDP connections for its > SyslogAppender. The API does not provide a way to configure the > SyslogAppender to use TCP instead. Log4j 2 API provides such configuration. > > Is there an easy way that I could modify the log4j 1.2.17 SyslogAppender to > use TCP instead of UDP or is my only option to upgrade to log4j 2? > > Thank you, > Apostolis Giannakidis > --001a11c3fe1ecb404a052a079f4b--