logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
Subject Re: status appender?
Date Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:32:51 GMT
First, what you are wanting to do is, in fact, pretty normal.  However, by default the StatusLogger
that Log4j uses for its components doesn’t use an Appender. Although the API is the same
the internals of the StatusLogger are actually quite different than the “normal” Log4j
implementation.  That said, the StatusLogger normally just writes to the console.  I actually
doubt that that is where you want your debug events to go.  Most people prefer them to go
to a rolling file.

To accomplish what you want you just need to set up filtering in your configuration so that
the FATAL-INFO events go to one Appender and the DEBUG and TRACE events go to another Appender.


> On Dec 14, 2015, at 8:34 AM, Nicholas Duane <nickdu@msn.com> wrote:
> I'm curious if there is such a thing as a StatusAppender in log4j2 which, as you would
guess, is the appender the StatusLogger would use?
> Here's what I'm trying to solve, I think.
> I've been telling other developers I work with that a piece of code should only write
to a single logger.  The reason for this, in my mind, is that if a piece of code writes to
more than one logger then it essentially has routing logic in it and I would rather have the
routing in the configuration.  For example:
> try
>    {
>    logger1.info(...);
>    .
>    .
>    .
>    logger2.debug(...);
>    }
> catch(Exception e)
>    {
>    logger1.error(...);
>    }
> The above code is sending debug events to a different logger than the rest of the events
it raises.  I would rather have the code send all events to a single logger and control where
those events are routed via the configuration.  Feel free to let me know whether this is in
line with logging principles.
> So here's the problem.  We've got some code which writes events to its logger.  We want
to capture these events centrally so we're sending them to a central location via an HTTP
appender.  We want to do this only for FATAL - INFO events, so we're not expecting a huge
load.  DEBUG events however, we'd like to send to the same location as the status logger.
 We can, of course, just add a console appender for DEBUG events but that would have to be
controlled separately from the status logger and ideally it would be nice to just piggy back
on the status logger.  We could have this code write to its private logger and the status
logger for DEBUG events, but then we get into the routing issue I mentioned above.  So I'm
wondering, is there such a thing as a StatusAppender?
> Thanks,
> Nick

To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org

View raw message