logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Evan J <maps.this.addr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Web Service Appender
Date Mon, 05 May 2014 23:23:58 GMT
This implementation is old and uses JAX-RPC/RMI calls which usually comes
up on top of search results for web service appenders. But thanks anyway.


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:48 AM, <Walter_Marvin@dellteam.com> wrote:

> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-log4j/index.html
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Evan J [mailto:maps.this.address@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 8:29 AM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
>
> Hi Walter,
>
> Can you point me to where one can try these freeware web service appenders?
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:23 AM, wrote:
>
> > Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
> > I just saying we have the ability to work with log4j directly at this
> > point. That should be useful since a custom appender will probably be
> > needed for speed reasons, There are appenders for web services already
> > written and available as freeware
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Walter
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.goers@dslextreme.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:59 AM
> > To: Log4J Users List
> > Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
> >
> > This thread originally started to ask about logging to a web service
> > (that term usually implies SOAP). It seems to have gone off into
> > another direction and I'm not sure if there is still a question here
> > someone wants answered. If you are making a proposal for an
> > enhancement to Log4j 2 I am not sure what it is.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> > On May 1, 2014, at 8:51 AM, wrote:
> >
> > > Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
> > > I take it we were discussing the possibilities for high speed
> > > production logging. Previous people have rightly pointed out that a
> > > simplistic approach using soap might be ineffecient
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.goers@dslextreme.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:36 AM
> > > To: Log4J Users List
> > > Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
> > >
> > > Thats fine. I'm just not really sure what the question is any more.
> > >
> > > Ralph
> > >
> > > On May 1, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Walter_Marvin@DellTeam.com wrote:
> > >
> > >> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
> > >> As I say there are a lot of architectural options. We need to
> > >> decide on
> > one. Having th ability to modify log4j should make whatever
> > architecture is chosen cleaner.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >>
> > >> Walter
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.goers@dslextreme.com]
> > >> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:16 AM
> > >> To: Log4J Users List
> > >> Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
> > >>
> > >> What you are describing is why I added the integration to Flume. It
> > >> is
> > very, very good at collecting log events and forwarding them. However,
> > you could use a JMS appender to write your events to the MQ queue.
> > >>
> > >> Ralph
> > >>
> > >> On May 1, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Evan J wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Ralph,
> > >>>
> > >>> All the request and response messages, some header data, with
> > >>> additional information, are placed in an MDC, packaged in an
> > >>> Appender and sent to an MQ queue which, ultimately, makes a call
> > >>> to the service. It's a centralized logging model for all the
> > >>> applications in a cluster. Frankly, I don't like the design nor
> > >>> the
> > setup, but I don't make such decisions (or requirements).
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> A web service to do what? Logging via SOAP would be extremely
> > >>>> slow if every log event is a single request. Can you elaborate
on
> > >>>> what you really want to do?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Ralph
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Apr 30, 2014, at 9:10 PM, Evan J wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks for verifying this. I thought I might be missing an
> > >>>>> obvious, and this has already been implemented by at least
someone.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Remko Popma
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Evan, no I'm not aware of any appender that logs to a web
service.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Evan J
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I searched around, but I could not find an off-the-shelf
> > >>>>>>> Appender that sends logs to a web service. Is there
any?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> -
> > >>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > >>>> log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > >>>> log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > >> log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message