logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <Walter_Mar...@DellTeam.com>
Subject RE: Web Service Appender
Date Thu, 01 May 2014 15:51:23 GMT
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
I take it we were discussing the possibilities for high speed production logging. Previous
people have rightly pointed out that a simplistic approach using soap might be ineffecient

-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.goers@dslextreme.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:36 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: Re: Web Service Appender

Thats fine. I'm just not really sure what the question is any more.

Ralph

On May 1, 2014, at 8:22 AM, Walter_Marvin@DellTeam.com wrote:

> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential
> As I say there are a lot of architectural options. We need to decide on one. Having th
ability to modify log4j should make whatever architecture is chosen cleaner.
>
> Thanks
>
> Walter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.goers@dslextreme.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:16 AM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: Web Service Appender
>
> What you are describing is why I added the integration to Flume. It is very, very good
at collecting log events and forwarding them. However, you could use a JMS appender to write
your events to the MQ queue.
>
> Ralph
>
> On May 1, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Evan J wrote:
>
>> Hi Ralph,
>>
>> All the request and response messages, some header data, with
>> additional information, are placed in an MDC, packaged in an Appender
>> and sent to an MQ queue which, ultimately, makes a call to the
>> service. It's a centralized logging model for all the applications in
>> a cluster. Frankly, I don't like the design nor the setup, but I don't make such
decisions (or requirements).
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>>> A web service to do what? Logging via SOAP would be extremely slow
>>> if every log event is a single request. Can you elaborate on what
>>> you really want to do?
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>> On Apr 30, 2014, at 9:10 PM, Evan J wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for verifying this. I thought I might be missing an obvious,
>>>> and this has already been implemented by at least someone.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Remko Popma
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Evan, no I'm not aware of any appender that logs to a web service.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Evan J
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I searched around, but I could not find an off-the-shelf Appender
>>>>>> that sends logs to a web service. Is there any?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message