Mailing-List: contact log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Log4J Users List" <log4j-user@logging.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of garydgregory@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:50:46 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CACZkXPz6jDvjvG-OdabRALsrUEHDyG0gwBh6AM4kBzMkpJryyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: DailyRollingFileAppender
From: Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
To: Log4J Users List <log4j-user@logging.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51b16e9ba8b0404ed1da22e

--bcaec51b16e9ba8b0404ed1da22e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Alec,

We are not focusing on version 1 any longer. You should consider using
version 2 instead.

Gary


On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Tomcat Random <tomcat.random@gmail.com>wrote:

> Log4j version 1.2.17
>
> From the docs:
>
> "DailyRollingFileAppender has been observed to exhibit synchronization
> issues and data loss.
>
> How bad exactly? Loss of an occasional error message, or loss of entire
> portions of logs? Synchronization issues affecting performance? I'm just
> wondering if using the classes in 'extras" are worth it.
>
> Best,
> Alec
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

--bcaec51b16e9ba8b0404ed1da22e--