Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-logging-log4j-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DFBEE1094C for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4563 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2013 15:47:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-user-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 4171 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2013 15:47:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Log4J Users List" Reply-To: "Log4J Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list log4j-user@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 4153 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2013 15:47:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:47:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of remko.popma@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.48] (HELO mail-oa0-f48.google.com) (209.85.219.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:47:49 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id m6so3814741oag.7 for ; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:47:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=DHbNCILA8toVeevbecJ1meFiw6ieCvDED5D7ETrGvkg=; b=y9Ag3SK28WbV1exGsd7PfLPMyOM0AG5varpbqa71vbZiNtURgSJQgTzb3k07Y8+nkY YZsGc+2Emw6ABDhG90em31HzzQIq5mTFG/5KQvizHqPl6jHNKDgAhn1JHpTElP9TKzkr EBiHFIjexo60wTJ+me3UWc8Kqb7ZCRc9yYTYSG08pjGMd98UUhltBvKmS7F5F0iKFzpQ c4cKtmxlLnIAFtqo2jX+S2FQwEfZGzZY+A8gKZ/GLhqDPtZRoa1evBSWEM5dWYnxdH8d tSY5+bI8A0C/OtckVD2WS64nu4YL+2d7wDA+68mH/COQ01LEmJoPffuNpheU/cOLUuEV PJBw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.88.129 with SMTP id bg1mr2936871obb.36.1380556048179; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.84.101 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:47:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 00:47:28 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: log4j 2 official release date From: Remko Popma To: Log4J Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01184a92d829aa04e79bc0cf X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e01184a92d829aa04e79bc0cf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey, that's my favorite log4j question! http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/async.html#Performance Enjoy! Remko On Monday, September 30, 2013, Navindian wrote: > Performance wise, log4j 1.x is better or log4j 2? > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Jingdong Sun > > wrote: > > > Can anyone tell me when the log4j 2 official release will be available? > > > > Thanks. > > Jingdong Sun > > InfoSphere Streams Development > > Phone 507 253-5958 (T/L 553-5958) > > jindong@us.ibm.com > --089e01184a92d829aa04e79bc0cf--