Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-logging-log4j-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9E5C10632 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 13:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14773 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2013 13:00:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-user-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 14746 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2013 13:00:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Log4J Users List" Reply-To: "Log4J Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list log4j-user@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 14729 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2013 13:00:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 13:00:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of michael.zhou@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.43] (HELO mail-wg0-f43.google.com) (74.125.82.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 13:00:18 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z12so4376366wgg.34 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 05:59:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=L5oXF8G0VyxgySju9mm9wNcA+R6YRDIlUKeocw1p1TU=; b=F/887nJ7iG0DVdpdZnE+ckz1r6S+h/+Td3bZ0jHpGmo2pBjyaKVSsspwSA3ZYtFQ6R 4RZMJecdMTdpQMDUU2NcGVhCvBRs1B5nQIQIfu9jUiH4o8RLAam4zzvg4Sn4YeJunLML +DVBv/t61ahD5TCYaGAmgdmc/UDkQ8G5qSmeDGNPy+BeggErNXSU/PUpesSc9FxhF1vb hp6o3FHFPqrtdf0tvS2v0WkLcDD1tmH3NYG1enk4GkPOqPUZ2SDw9ECnW9u8HaHK7ixa KD5ZNuK80AKv78CxnaK1x8+lF0k/d5/aiNG8PBWEcZowqsn42Elj/9u0vyhi4VVaJizz BzrQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.187.51 with SMTP id fp19mr9910581wic.1.1380459598237; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 05:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.154.129 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Sep 2013 05:59:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 08:59:58 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: log4j 2 official release date From: Michael Zhou To: Log4J Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c37ba2fad5e204e7854b99 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c37ba2fad5e204e7854b99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Remko, You can find the micro-benchmarking tool I wrote on Github: https://github.com/michaelzhou999/logging-profiling Drop me a message if you have any questions. Thanks Michael On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Remko Popma wrote: > Michael, > > I'd be interested to see your benchmarking code and results. Is it > possible for you to share them? > > Remko > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 2013/09/29, at 7:58, Michael Zhou wrote: > > > > The micro-benchmark testing I wrote to compare Log4j 1 and 2 shows > > considerable performance gain in favor of Log4j 2. I have only one > request > > for your consideration: simplifying the way to get all loggers in the > > system and set/reset logging levels for certain loggers. This is very > easy > > to do in Log4j 1, but thanks to the rewrite of API and implementation in > > Log4j 2, it becomes complicated. I did search and read previous > > discussions (in August and May) on this topic, and consider this a much > > needed feature request. Thanks > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Ralph Goers >wrote: > > > >> I'd prefer to turn this around and ask a couple of questions: > >> > >> 1. Why do you need to know the "official release" date? Is something > >> blocking you from using Log4j 2? > >> 2. Are you currently using the beta releases? Are you satisfied that it > >> is production ready in your environment? > >> > >> The answers to the questions above are important for us as that is the > >> basis for us labeling the release 2.0 GA vs 2.0 beta10 (or 2.0 RC1). > >> > >> Ralph > >> > >>> On Sep 27, 2013, at 8:07 AM, Jingdong Sun wrote: > >>> > >>> Can anyone tell me when the log4j 2 official release will be available? > >>> > >>> Thanks. > >>> Jingdong Sun > >>> InfoSphere Streams Development > >>> Phone 507 253-5958 (T/L 553-5958) > >>> jindong@us.ibm.com > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org > > > > > > -- > > Michael > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org > > -- Michael --001a11c37ba2fad5e204e7854b99--