logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Tonhofer <d.tonho...@m-plify.com>
Subject Re: Doubt in Log4j
Date Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:19:54 GMT
..even more important do not have an appender on the root log hierarchy but
assign file appender to the four nodes you have defined.

See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/manual.html under 'appender & 
layouts'

James Stauffer wrote:
> Just name the logger after the concrete class name.  It would actually
> be more work to use an interface name.
>
> On 10/5/06, sudhakardvvn <dvvn_sudha@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> In my project we are using log4j for logging purpose. In my project 
>> there is
>> a interface with the name DC. But there will be different instances 
>> for it
>> like DC1,DC2,DC3 etc. How can they will have different log files for 
>> each
>> DC. Is it possible or not? If yes, how can we achieve it. Its very 
>> urgent
>> Thanks in Advane
>> Sudhakar
>> -- 
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://www.nabble.com/Doubt-in-Log4j-tf2386744.html#a6653439
>> Sent from the Log4j - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org
>>
>>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message