Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25526 invoked from network); 3 May 2004 08:33:14 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 May 2004 08:33:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 23979 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2004 08:32:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-user-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 23956 invoked by uid 500); 3 May 2004 08:32:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Log4J Users List" Reply-To: "Log4J Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list log4j-user@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 23915 invoked from network); 3 May 2004 08:32:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO voyager.coretrek.no) (212.33.142.2) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 May 2004 08:32:42 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by voyager.coretrek.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F311A89AA for ; Mon, 3 May 2004 10:32:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from excalibur.intra.coretrek.com (wormhole.coretrek.no [212.33.142.10]) by voyager.coretrek.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDF9A89A4 for ; Mon, 3 May 2004 10:32:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 10:32:54 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Endre_St=F8lsvik?= X-X-Sender: endre@excalibur.intra.coretrek.com To: Log4J Users List Subject: RE: An odd configuration need... In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.0.20040501145705.03157fa0@mail.qos.ch> Message-ID: X-My-Opinion: War and bombs are bad. Peace and flowers are good. ;-D MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 (CoreTrek patch 1) X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sat, 1 May 2004, Ceki G�lc� wrote: | I am aware of the fact that this may be frustrating, especially if the | chainsaw part is nearing readiness for prime time. I'd like to finish | work on DBAppedner (3-4 days) and Joran (2-3 days) before releasing | 1.3 alpha. Frustrating? Hell yes: TRACE level!! | | The official release of 1.3 requires much more work, in particular a | significant internal revamp to support domains. Why not call that 2.0, and get 1.3 out the door? Seems to me like domains are stuff far off - they are "on the drawing board". Should the 1.3 be put on hold -that long-? And why not call it 2.0 to signify that conceptual big change? Endre. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-help@logging.apache.org