logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bellamy, Scot" <Scot.Bell...@cardinal.com>
Subject RE: Experience with C/C++ Log4j ports
Date Tue, 18 Jun 2002 15:46:56 GMT
We haven't completed our project yet but we are not anticipating any
performance issue.  We are planning on using the asynchronous capability
of Log4J which should all but eliminate any performance bottleneck.  If
you are logging synchronously, you might find enough performance gain in
a native port to consider using it.

Scot.

Scot Bellamy
Infrastructure & Architecture
eBusiness Technology
Cardinal Health, Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: Fabien Modoux [mailto:fabien@voicemate.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Log4J Users List
Subject: RE: Experience with C/C++ Log4j ports


Hello Scot,

Thank your very much for sharing your experience.

This seems like a very good idea. Do you think that
there could be any performance issue, comparing to
using a native port? 

Regards,

Fabien 

---------------------------------------------      
Fabien Modoux,
Voicemate - http://www.voicemate.com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bellamy, Scot [mailto:Scot.Bellamy@cardinal.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 7:59 AM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: RE: Experience with C/C++ Log4j ports
> 
> 
> Fabien,
> 
> An alternative to finding a Log4J port is to create a JNI interface to

> Log4J.  We chose this path because we have both C/C++ and Java 
> applications in our environment and this allows us to maintain only 
> one logging utility.
> 
> We are finishing design and will be implementing within the next 
> couple of weeks.
> 
> Scot.
> 
> Scot Bellamy
> Infrastructure & Architecture
> eBusiness Technology
> Cardinal Health, Inc.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabien Modoux [mailto:fabien@voicemate.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5:37 PM
> To: log4j-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: Experience with C/C++ Log4j ports
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We have been using Log4j in the Java components of our system for
> more than a year. The package is great and we would like to port 
> our C/C++ components to a similar framework. 
> We noticed that there were several C/C++ ports of Log4j available and
> wanted to know if anyone has used them and what they experiences were.

> 
> I found three posts about Log4C in the list archive but there was
> not much information on the comparison and status of the different 
> ports.
> 
> Thanks in advance for your help.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Fabien
> 
> ---------------------------------------------      
> Fabien Modoux,
> Voicemate - http://www.voicemate.com
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> <mailto:log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> <mailto:log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<mailto:log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<mailto:log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>



Mime
View raw message