logging-log4j-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Cakalic, James" <James.Caka...@heybridge.com>
Subject RE: survey: Is the FATAL priority level useful?
Date Tue, 19 Feb 2002 15:28:21 GMT
OK. The link to it is IMO somewhat hard to find so I just wanted to make
sure that you hadn't missed it.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trent Mick [mailto:trentm@ActiveState.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 5:02 PM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: survey: Is the FATAL priority level useful?
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 05:08:15PM -0500, Cakalic, James wrote:
> > Were you aware of the log4py project on sourceforge?
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/log4py/
> Jim,
> Yes, I have looked briefly at log4py. Log4py is a little 
> limited for what I
> would like to see in the Python core. It is a minimal port of log4j,
> eschewing the concept of subclassable Appenders and Filters, 
> etc. I want the
> full meal deal. :)
> c.f. http://python.sourceforge.net/peps/pep-0282.html
> Thanks,
> Trent
> -- 
> Trent Mick
> TrentM@ActiveState.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:log4j-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> <mailto:log4j-user-help@jakarta.apache.org>

<font size="1">Confidentiality Warning:  This e-mail contains information intended only
for the use of the individual or entity named above.  If the reader of this e-mail is not
the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, any dissemination, publication or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.
The sender does not accept any responsibility for any loss, disruption or damage to your data
or computer system that may occur while using data contained in, or transmitted with, this
e-mail.   If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify us by return
e-mail.  Thank you.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message