Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5FA200C13 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:16:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id AC8B7160B49; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 063EA160B64 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:15:59 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 37482 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2017 16:15:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Log4J Developers List" Reply-To: "Log4J Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list log4j-dev@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 37471 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2017 16:15:58 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 16:15:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id F030BC02B5 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:15:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t89nm2YEwu6P for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f52.google.com (mail-lf0-f52.google.com [209.85.215.52]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id DAF635FB5B for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f52.google.com with SMTP id n124so47440311lfd.2 for ; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 08:15:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6sIt912Mb6ir0vKJpsxqYwkVoeHRcuLbjsoJI0RQtBY=; b=HXE6kHPmziEw8vm6Bz6wyin6NSwaxUObfaaYfZeyqpLqu0/Z6z2aen5HuXHHVfUpmZ Fp0ZpNz0aN4mukScbRq8OtF29Qu7yc0UQVAjahPuGREVeHIo3yLS+XJyQy9cTeoH0UBf 1Bw0qjYh+cc+2mKVJB52D6mbSkxb4WNv8BmrO1b7ZKPcofc5zt4c4CMHxTi+FuCsiOMI a8S+btQgvXJuktOes+gsr0XT0HKsshT0PwnTqNWa8QWcuZdtDI+mvksf2FKo/ALRjLz5 OBN61lOgAivczX+8A7FRUJrz532OUdPvC62Wd+eguxbdppj90XhOtEhL5u0ETcTlP/rt Qi/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=6sIt912Mb6ir0vKJpsxqYwkVoeHRcuLbjsoJI0RQtBY=; b=N9HpaQhourzeAdbKJAJyHqJVbMxxwHyNN1zhXXLEC/mBitQAGzfktAc38sVCwUz2UA AT2X0XwyvUfGs4VdYnGTAjpdqm0mLtLnhWeJuF6wDHaM4I/K9bEiGVN9s9/gUpl1u0hG qq/pi72zGmrDIdNJkZwXjhH1rFuxSoX0Sp+jim+KQxAPpbOYrWUarP34ZXmPuvEtYhOD +GHTWdZY2/uC++M32Zf2wCPdi0Rwvvfjabmj2SzXOGKa0gfN4vNISDLBJUR4mkGfhzcx 978XXxs5g/RG4i1J+AMwoydbqNjmVfZhUjRX/suTfMKYdyb2i4O+ZODYCcgBU/sb1XB6 Oo2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI0nOl4QXe0lpOFxJosEV97xp8n1eE2xuvIY+ZNQEkH6ps4GbwtkdNrwH8JToBfqyWMTTTaMYKMqcaFCQ== X-Received: by 10.25.0.140 with SMTP id 134mr3925106lfa.156.1486397754218; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 08:15:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.158.76 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 08:15:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Matt Sicker Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:15:53 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Java 9 To: Log4J Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113c95ce22a04e0547def25e archived-at: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 16:16:00 -0000 --001a113c95ce22a04e0547def25e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I remember Ralph mentioned that he tested it out and found that it worked pretty well. See issue: On 6 February 2017 at 09:56, Remko Popma wrote: > I haven't had a chance to look at this yet, but is the new stack walking > API in Java 9 of any use for us? I believe applications/libraries like > Log4j were supposed to be the drivers behind this feature, but last time I > checked they were not going to cater for our use case (inspect the stack > from the bottom up)... > > From a functional point of view, is anybody aware of anything outstanding > we need to fix for Log4j 2 to work correctly on Java 9? > > Remko > -- Matt Sicker --001a113c95ce22a04e0547def25e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I remember Ralph mentioned that he tested it out and found= that it worked pretty well. See issue: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2= -1359>

On 6 February 2017 at 09:56, Remko Popma <remko.popma@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
I have= n't had a chance to look at this yet, but is the new stack walking API = in Java 9 of any use for us? I believe applications/libraries like Log4j we= re supposed to be the drivers behind this feature, but last time I checked = they were not going to cater for our use case (inspect the stack from the b= ottom up)...=C2=A0

From a functional point of view, is a= nybody aware of anything outstanding we need to fix for Log4j 2 to work cor= rectly on Java 9?
=
Remko



--
Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>=
--001a113c95ce22a04e0547def25e--