logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Logback performance improvements
Date Sun, 05 Feb 2017 20:48:07 GMT
If you want, I can run tests on Windows once the build works on Windows
again.

Let me know what args/command line...

Gary

On Feb 5, 2017 11:58 AM, "Apache" <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com> wrote:

> I guess my MacBook Pro must fit in the Slow CPU/Fast Hard drive category.
> With Logback 1.10 and -t 4  now get
>
> Benchmark                                         Mode  Samples
> Score       Error  Units
> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.julFile        thrpt       20
> 98187.673 ±  4935.712  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.log4j1File     thrpt       20
> 842374.496 ±  6762.712  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.log4j2File     thrpt       20
> 1853062.583 ± 67032.225  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.log4j2RAF      thrpt       20
> 2036011.226 ± 53208.281  ops/s
> o.a.l.l.p.j.FileAppenderBenchmark.logbackFile    thrpt       20
> 999667.438 ± 12074.003  ops/s
>
> I’ll have to try this on one my VMs at work. We don’t run anything
> directly on bare metal any more.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Feb 5, 2017, at 9:40 AM, Apache <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
> Ceki finally fixed some of the performance problems in the FileAppender.
> See https://logback.qos.ch/news.html and https://docs.
> google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cpb5D7qnyye4W0RTlHUnXedYK98ca
> tNZytYIu5D91m0/edit#gid=0. I suspect we have a few optimizations we can
> make.
>
> Ralph
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message