logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Remaining tasks for a 2.8 release
Date Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:58:34 GMT
Are you able to make a PR on GitHub for review? That'd be a neat way to
interactively review our own internal branches. Not sure if you need to do
it from a fork, though.

On 17 January 2017 at 10:20, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.staldal@magine.com>
wrote:

> I think we should get LOG4J2-1748 and LOG4J2-1780 resolved before 2.8, I
> have a branch out for review.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm working on getting the Log4j Scala repo set up independently from the
>> main Log4j repo (and doing Log4j Boot on the side; this will be released
>> independently, so don't worry about this blocking anything) and doing some
>> general site cleanups and whatnot. For 2.8, the other non-core modules will
>> most likely remain where they are and the Log4j Scala API repo gets to be
>> our first foray into the separated repos space.
>>
>> Feature-wise, are there any other things we'd like to complete before
>> cutting a 2.8 release? Based on the ongoing Zookeeper migration, I see the
>> pain points of migrating config formats being brought up again, so it would
>> be great to get our Log4j 1 config support in this release, but that
>> depends on timing, too (we could always RERO and add it to the next release
>> if nobody has time to finish that feature).
>>
>> --
>> Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> [image: MagineTV]
>
> *Mikael Ståldal*
> Senior software developer
>
> *Magine TV*
> mikael.staldal@magine.com
> Grev Turegatan 3  | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden  |   www.magine.com
>
> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> email.
>



-- 
Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>

Mime
View raw message