logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: logging-log4j repositories
Date Sun, 13 Nov 2016 04:12:04 GMT
>From a dev POV, it's not great to pull from one repo that has all these
various language bindings.

Gary

On Nov 12, 2016 6:44 PM, "Remko Popma" <remko.popma@gmail.com> wrote:

> What do you mean, pick up? Are you talking from a user's point of view
> about the distribution, or from a developer's POV about your workspace?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 13 Nov 2016, at 11:10, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hm, on 2nd though I'm not sure if I'd want to pick up all JVM lang updates
> if I only care about one...
>
> Gary
>
> On Nov 12, 2016 6:08 PM, "Gary Gregory" <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I like that much better... log4j-jvm instead of jvmlang I think.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On Nov 12, 2016 6:00 PM, "Remko Popma" <remko.popma@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Looking at LOG4J2-1705, I was thinking that requiring a separate
>> repository for each language could increase the barrier to entry for ideas
>> like that.
>> >
>> > Would it be a good idea to create a single repository
>> (logging-log4j-jvmlang?) which would hold modules for all non-java JVM
>> languages, like scala, kotlin, groovy, jruby, ... ?
>>
>

Mime
View raw message