logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Roadmap for 3.0
Date Thu, 15 Sep 2016 18:19:02 GMT
Yeah, agreed on the Java 9 bit. If it's impossible to make 2.x compatible
with Java 9 without making backwards incompatible changes, that might be
the push needed to start planning for 3.0.

On 15 September 2016 at 13:05, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com>
wrote:

> I am nowhere near wanting to do 3.0. But we may want to do it for Java 9
> depending on how disruptive that is.  That is one of the reasons I would
> like to get moving on Java 9 asap.  I have a feeling we may want to
> continue the 2.x releases while 3.x is going just for that reason.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:46 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Should we start thinking about 3.0 where the main driver is to formalize a
> Core SPI package?
>
> Doing this for 2.8 and break BC in Core would be too disruptive.
>
> Doing this for 2.8 and have a Core class implement a SPI interface where
> the SPI interface inherits the old interface would be weird.
>
> Or, should we just keep on going as we have and keep Core BC a moving
> target?
>
> We could wait to do more 2.x releases and accumulate more deprecated code
> (Builders vs factory methods for example).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Gary
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>

Mime
View raw message