Hmm.... Maybe this was not a very good link...
In general I want to encourage people to write about Log4j 2 though. 
I think Log4j 2 is still relatively unknown and we need other people to help us spread awareness.

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm not exactly sure why the author uses the internal JUL LogManager instead of the standard one (which gets replaced with ours on initialization anyways).




--
Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>