logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Article link
Date Sun, 26 Jun 2016 19:01:41 GMT
I agree that we should be doing whatever we can to spread awareness. Part
of that seems to be correcting misconceptions. I don't know how many times
I've had to explain that log4j-api is basically like slf4j-api on steroids
and is just as much of a facade as SLF4J is.

On 25 June 2016 at 21:11, Remko Popma <remko.popma@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hmm.... Maybe this was not a very good link...
> In general I want to encourage people to write about Log4j 2 though.
> I think Log4j 2 is still relatively unknown and we need other people to
> help us spread awareness.
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 3:19 AM, Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm not exactly sure why the author uses the internal JUL LogManager
>> instead of the standard one (which gets replaced with ours on
>> initialization anyways).
>>
>> On 25 June 2016 at 02:21, Remko Popma <remko.popma@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://javaevangelist.blogspot.jp/2016/06/log4j2-javautillogging-jul-adapter.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+JavaEvangelistJohnYearysBlog+(Java+Evangelist+John+Yeary's+Blog)&m=1
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
>>
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>

Mime
View raw message