logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Location performance
Date Tue, 10 May 2016 16:26:53 GMT
That _does_ look worse but I think Paul is right and there is a separate
API we need to use:
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/259


On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Paul Benedict <pbenedict@apache.org> wrote:

> Are you using the new JDK 9 APIs to walk the stack?
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Supposedly Java 9 was supposed to improve the performance of walking the
>> stack trace. However, the numbers I get below indicate to me that they are
>> moving in the opposite direction.  Am I misreading this?
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> java version "1.7.0_80
>>
>> Benchmark
>>   Mode  Samples       Score      Error  Units
>>
>> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2LocationBenchmark.throughputSimple
>>   thrpt       20  124819.285 ± 3003.918  ops/s
>>
>> java version "1.8.0_65"
>>
>> Benchmark
>>   Mode  Samples       Score      Error  Units
>> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2LocationBenchmark.throughputSimple
>>   thrpt       20  123209.746 ± 3064.672  ops/s
>>
>>
>> java version "9-ea"
>>
>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 9-ea+116)
>>
>> Benchmark
>>   Mode  Samples      Score      Error  Units
>>
>> o.a.l.l.p.j.AsyncAppenderLog4j2LocationBenchmark.throughputSimple
>>   thrpt       20  96090.261 ± 4565.763  ops/s
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message