Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-logging-log4j-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF412180F7 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:48:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8746 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2016 09:48:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-dev-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 8699 invoked by uid 500); 26 Feb 2016 09:48:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Log4J Developers List" Reply-To: "Log4J Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list log4j-dev@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 8689 invoked by uid 99); 26 Feb 2016 09:48:13 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:48:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id DDD3A180492 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:48:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.199 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.199 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cGA2eVGzoPKR for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com (mail-pa0-f51.google.com [209.85.220.51]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C46885F119 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fl4so48629972pad.0 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:48:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=E3b5OlfM/lVxXr+CDvNVOo6ZcLJoSENnMrfdCDMqzcY=; b=LBgCBWiLGMBj713cty0mQpoMErtbhUFUzq+HZyanuXPkBIF6l1FYCx8v+/YZ81pTa/ LzYE/atjHOeYwbfUSEcPc60Szf92HETWL8arS/nbbtl8ucQVShvzm74bekIbmaiOCIQd IV4/w54I9tp09wyz5AYvjKa2LaeuQyfT8LXAsPCjYW63pUTmo/qa22Jq/mlPdWv7wwGK HwvsRFchcEuCElIVJR6OmI9E3Z9VDFOwmZrckDzMSA6D82CiMq+QgRyGs/g6DG9p6Oyw bi3LQdSM7P+SD3NXndVx0HpT8OeJExa8Kodjg+qb+TCVTV2c9W5ADLgZSUbATuDLSWwl 4BPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=E3b5OlfM/lVxXr+CDvNVOo6ZcLJoSENnMrfdCDMqzcY=; b=BCtbJ93Pt4svr9rh+9H1mH+mqiVeyeDcaNKh8e6+EGWlLpY4y1mYXjKJdDq5MxB0Ks bfwyqm5gG03fZhpzkNLxmyPrU9bL+ZzUzqbrBejxL/Tem1gfos1NWDUWtaRuPADAuY7L DD4Ko88dvNveklfXmIaEydbFtcyd4ZYdvJUwia0yTmO/ikkBAZgTaGMwimHwwoxncS7i qGSdwgwJGlU0fub9Ozpy0umZxO4ojQ4SoQcBql+FdC39wnxrcVcjRsul87KiWHItAUbi fwmJDkdJByAjUUWfwjtzIHF2Q99A1g5OssDKp+rOtObRlcSM3zPjdgXwrt2uWEdg1iMR bb/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJhuHBFfWoqx1evuIAd/zMeqxkIn7vYMBnn6JEORFUDLQh7dNIop+XLMTzPEw82+w== X-Received: by 10.67.6.10 with SMTP id cq10mr759493pad.120.1456480089401; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:48:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.66.124.149] (pw126152137242.10.panda-world.ne.jp. [126.152.137.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fc8sm18016900pab.21.2016.02.26.01.48.08 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 01:48:08 -0800 (PST) From: Remko Popma Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-C8D1C6DD-5D79-4934-8098-169B8A25042A Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Fast and Furious Message-Id: Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:48:05 +0900 References: In-Reply-To: To: Log4J Developers List X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13D15) --Apple-Mail-C8D1C6DD-5D79-4934-8098-169B8A25042A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You're absolutely right. I still have quite a few unit tests to add.=20 Initial perf testing shows a downward trend in Async Logger performance with= every release. (Logging simple string messages without params.) This is wor= risome and I'm focusing on figuring that out first: this will likely involve= additional code changes and I'll add more tests after that.=20 Sent from my iPhone > On 2016/02/26, at 10:38, Gary Gregory wrote: >=20 > Wow, I love the activity we are seeing toward 2.6! All the perf work on to= p of an existing sizable change set. Very exciting indeed. >=20 > There sure are a lot of changes coming in. I hope that we all can pitch in= to make sure most if not all of these changes get code coverage from unit t= ests. I've not checked closely, but it seems like we may not have good cover= age _yet_, or do I have the wrong impression? >=20 > I want to make sure we keep our stability in tip top shape :-) and that we= have no regression from previous releases. >=20 > Gary >=20 > --=20 > E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org=20 > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com=20 > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --Apple-Mail-C8D1C6DD-5D79-4934-8098-169B8A25042A Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You're absolutely right. I still have q= uite a few unit tests to add. 

=
Initial perf testing shows a downward t= rend in Async Logger performance with every release. (Logging simple string messages with= out params.) This is worrisome and I'm focusing on figuring that out first: t= his will likely involve additional code changes and I'll add more tests afte= r that. 

Sent from my iPhone

On 2016/02/26,= at 10:38, Gary Gregory <garydg= regory@gmail.com> wrote:

=
Wow, I love the activity we are seeing toward 2.6! All the p= erf work on top of an existing sizable change set. Very exciting indeed.
There sure are a lot of changes coming in. I hope that we al= l can pitch in to make sure most if not all of these changes get code covera= ge from unit tests. I've not checked closely, but it seems like we may not h= ave good coverage _yet_, or do I have the wrong impression?

I want to make sure we keep our stability in tip top shape :-) and t= hat we have no regression from previous releases.

= --Apple-Mail-C8D1C6DD-5D79-4934-8098-169B8A25042A--