logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Releasing 2.4
Date Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:05:53 GMT
I'll review the patch ASAP...

Gary

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com>
wrote:

> I had planned on committing the fix for 812 as soon as I got agreement
> from everyone that it is the right approach. The code is all done and all
> the unit tests pass.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 8:14 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Thinking aloud:
>
> It feels like the changes we are discussing in LOG4J-812 and LOG4J-1074
> are important and tricky to get right.
>
> I wonder if the project would benefit from releasing the large set of
> fixes, features, and updates we have now as 2.4 and then getting back to
> working on LOG4J-812 and LOG4J-1074 for 2.5.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Gary
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I’ve assigned Jiras I would like to work on to myself. There are probably
>> more I’d like to do. That said, I probably won’t get to them before 2.4 is
>> released.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On Jun 27, 2015, at 3:44 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Devs,
>>
>> Curious: Do you all have set list of JIRAs you are addressing before 2.4?
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> End of June sounds good.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original message --------
>>> From: Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com>
>>> Date: 06/02/2015 15:09 (GMT-08:00)
>>> To: Log4J Developers List <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>
>>> Subject: Re: Releasing 2.4
>>>
>>> I would prefer to find some time to work on some issues instead of
>>> spending that on doing a release.  But no later than the end of June.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>> On Jun 2, 2015, at 3:02 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It's been almost a month since 2.3 and we already have a nice little
>>> batch of changes for 2.4.
>>>
>>> In particular, the 1.2 compatibility fixes to NDC pop() and peek() would
>>> be good to push out ASAP.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Mime
View raw message