logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Log4j 2.0.1 candidate 1
Date Mon, 04 Aug 2014 18:59:46 GMT
I can do the Nexus part now. I deleted the distribution directory. Should I
also delete log4j-perf due to it being GPL'd?


On 4 August 2014 13:47, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com> wrote:

> The order of publishing the artifacts doesn’t really matter much - except
> you don’t really want the site going live until the artifacts are committed
> to svn.  I always do the Nexus release first.  I believe you have
> permission to do that. If not I am pretty sure I can do it even though you
> created it.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Aug 4, 2014, at 11:43 AM, Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The steps said not to do that until after it was committed to the other
> svn repo. I don't have rights to do any of that.
>
>
> On 4 August 2014 10:42, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
>> Also, do you have rights to publish the site?    I can publish the
>> distribution artifacts when I get home tonight. I already have them when I
>> verified the release.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On Aug 4, 2014, at 7:30 AM, Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 Remko Popma
>> +1 Gary Gregory
>> +1 Ralph Goers
>>
>> +1 (non-binding) Bruno Mahe
>>
>> The release vote passed with +3 binding, +1 non-binding. The release
>> artifacts are all on my site:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~mattsicker/log4j/
>>
>> We need a PMC to commit these to svn.
>>
>> --
>> Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
>
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>

Mime
View raw message