logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: What will the GA version number be?
Date Tue, 04 Feb 2014 07:21:39 GMT
Nick,

I do not think you can go wrong by writing 2.0 in the book. I'm OK with 2.0
and 2.0.0 even though 2.0.0 feels redundant. Like someone else posted I
find the .FINAL and -RELEASE and whatnot ludicrous.

Gary


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Nick Williams <nicholas@nicholaswilliams.net
> wrote:

> Well well well. I'm sensing a lot of disagreement. Too bad my book goes to
> the printers Wednesday. I have a feeling no matter what I put in it there's
> a good chance it'll change. :-P
>
> Any way we can come to a consensus in the next 6-8 hours or so (by 9 a.m.
> CST)?
>
> N
>
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 3:46 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
> Plus, if we're really keen on OSGi support, note that OSGi assumes version
> numbers follow the semantic versioning scheme. Producers use an API like
> [1.1, 1.2), whereas consumers use an API like [1.1, 2.0). Yes, those are
> half-open intervals, and yes, that is the official notation. :)
>
>
> On 3 February 2014 15:41, Christian Grobmeier <grobmeier@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3 Feb 2014, at 22:14, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>
>> > I like 2.0.0 because semver.org etc., although as long as it's not a
>> dumb
>> > version number like GA or RELEASE or Final, I'm happy with it.
>>
>> Sticking with semver might be a good idea. Its a language many understand
>> and we should try to stick with that lanugage as well.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 3 February 2014 07:07, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Keep it simple: 2.0.
>> >>
>> >> Gary
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -------- Original message --------
>> >> From: Christian Grobmeier
>> >> Date:02/03/2014 05:12 (GMT-05:00)
>> >> To: Log4J Developers List
>> >> Subject: Re: What will the GA version number be?
>> >>
>> >> Also 2.0 or 2.0.0 for me
>> >>
>> >> On 3 Feb 2014, at 7:41, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I had thought it would be 2.0.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sent from my iPad
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Feb 2, 2014, at 8:59 PM, Nick Williams
>> >>>> <nicholas@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'm finalizing the logging chapter of my book to send to the printers
>> >>>> Wednesday (I'm so glad I got to correct it to say Level was
>> >>>> extendable!), and I need to know what the Maven artifact GA version
>> >>>> number will be. I print the new Maven artifacts used in each chapter
>> >>>> on the first page of the chapter as a guide to the user. Log4j is
the
>> >>>> only library I'm using that isn't yet GA. I want to be sure the
>> >>>> version numbers I'm printing are correct.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Here are the options that I can think of for the GA release:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2.0
>> >>>> 2.0-GA
>> >>>> 2.0.GA
>> >>>> 2.0.Final
>> >>>> 2.0.RELEASE
>> >>>> 2.0.0
>> >>>> 2.0.0-GA
>> >>>> 2.0.0.GA
>> >>>> 2.0.0.Final
>> >>>> 2.0.0.RELEASE
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So, which is it going to be? I assume that eventually we're going
to
>> >>>> have a 2.0.1, 2.0.2, etc., so it would seem to me that, whatever
GA
>> >>>> is, it should start with 2.0.0. Doesn't seem to make a lot of sense
>> >>>> to go from 2.0 to 2.0.1. However, all of our beta releases have
been
>> >>>> 2.0-Betan.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thoughts?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Nick
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---
>> >> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> >> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
>> >> @grobmeier
>> >> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
>> @grobmeier
>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <boards@gmail.com>
>
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Mime
View raw message