Mailing-List: contact log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Log4J Developers List" <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKpWnhTMGu=HB62F3050sDY-mid_dSy1TA+SHC-yApx6fP_odQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <44296D16-8593-40C0-AF98-45288DDA7EFD@dslextreme.com>
 <CAKpWnhTMGu=HB62F3050sDY-mid_dSy1TA+SHC-yApx6fP_odQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ivan Habunek <ihabunek@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:52:47 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAKpWnhSF9RCDmKaagtUfa8E0qC6DX7BZOWdRWDdS-0EK6D8W-w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.0-beta3 rc3
To: Log4J Developers List <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 11 November 2012 20:05, Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.0-beta3, the fifth release of Log4j 2.0=
.
>
> Please test and cast your votes.
> [] +1, release the artifacts
> [] -1, don't release because=85

I have reviewed the usual suspects (sigs, hashes, site, test),
everything checks out.

Therefore:
+1

The site is still pretty terrible visually. Especially if your browser
is not full-screen. Have you considered the suggestions I made on the
last release? I could do some of the work re-skinning the site to make
it more similar to the log4php site. For some reason we never agreed
on anything the last time we discussed this.

Regards,
Ivan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org