Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-logging-log4j-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A52DDC51 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 14:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77355 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2012 14:14:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-logging-log4j-dev-archive@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 77041 invoked by uid 500); 4 Nov 2012 14:14:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Log4J Developers List" Reply-To: "Log4J Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list log4j-dev@logging.apache.org Received: (qmail 77001 invoked by uid 99); 4 Nov 2012 14:13:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 14:13:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URIBL_DBL_REDIR X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of garydgregory@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.67 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.67] (HELO mail-pb0-f67.google.com) (209.85.160.67) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 14:13:54 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f67.google.com with SMTP id ro8so1828003pbb.10 for ; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 06:13:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SdzupejU9vWWd9vwM7WF1bCD82GfAV6M4kdxFxfGHhU=; b=TI62It5V8u3204Xs4ARDatjXa4rBO0kTqD+uoHZaPc7mfDdvTqaN/q/9BREv5ZbAp1 DSrhcOotCwrejTLDT8xUlphOrXZRx/AKFUei2orz++7WhrH9pzgKNAmyrUqxMbCc9gDI tDCgQ1kHtZzhWWjD+tbiCVLeiGIPKdr6xf/RRVkgd2ZrjEa3wDKHp8YUN0ZO3G41/hwV 3MvLqZJP7I7QOYs6+aFDWLYYdUnC7gmWHp5N3IwAqmLuFsU2vlEK71epRxdoFAQnFt+9 Mx8CShq+9WUYu+S3CDtP8Cy/UoiAgZWykndg8YFixVY5LFgHHmQT1/0WBeRusKhRs0eO 3Vdw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.69.0.40 with SMTP id av8mr22471324pbd.117.1352038414199; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 06:13:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.134.36 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 06:13:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 09:13:34 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Curious: org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager vs. other names From: Gary Gregory To: Log4J Developers List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e130166aba804cdabf9d0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b2e130166aba804cdabf9d0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi All: We have LogManager but the class serves Logger objects. Why did we pick this name vs any other like LoggerManager or LoggerFactory? Gary -- E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: http://bit.ly/ECvg0 Spring Batch in Action: http://bit.ly/bqpbCK Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --047d7b2e130166aba804cdabf9d0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All:

We have LogManager but the class serves Logger objects. Why = did we pick this name vs any other like LoggerManager or LoggerFactory?

Gary
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: http://bit.ly/ECvg= 0
Spring Batch in Action: http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http:= //garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory=
--047d7b2e130166aba804cdabf9d0--