logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [v2] @since
Date Thu, 01 Nov 2012 22:10:39 GMT
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Jacob Kjome <hoju@visi.com> wrote:

>
> Isn't @since redundant for the first release?  That is, it can be assumed
> that any class/method that doesn't have it is presumed to be @since 2.0.
> It's only after you start adding methods/classes in later releases that you
> bother to explicitly mention @since, referencing the release that the
> feature was introduced.
>
> If there are existing @since tags, I would suggest getting rid of them
> all.  And I wouldn't bother using @since tags for beta releases.  Only for
> full releases.
>
>
+1

Cheers


>
> Jake
>
>
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:53:14 -0700
>  Ralph Goers <ralph.goers@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>
>> You'd be surprised how much I was able to borrow from Log4j 1.x.  Of
>> course, virtually all of it had to be modified.  That said, none of it is
>> compatible so it probably doesn't make sense to leave it that way.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On Nov 1, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>  Should all classes be @since 2.0?
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org JUnit in Action,
>>> 2nd Ed: http://bit.ly/ECvg0
>>> Spring Batch in Action: http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.**com<http://garygregory.wordpress.com>Home:
>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.**apache.org<log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.**org<log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org>
>
>


-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

Mime
View raw message