logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Lack of Category.error(Throwable t)
Date Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:26:47 GMT
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Gary Gregory <ggregory@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Question: how important is 100% bc for 1.2.x line? My assumption is:
>> very much... but well, as mentioned, I am not really opposed - just
>> careful
>
>
> As long as I can do a couple of search and replaces, BC is not that
> important to me in this case because the API is not big, it's a "nice to
> have".

This is certainly a strong argument... along with the version number
change it would be possible. And how many methods might be removed? I
think they are only less


-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de
https://www.timeandbill.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message