logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [companions] Which ones for chainsaw?
Date Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:54:55 GMT
> I agree, component makes sense because of the dependencies.

Fine, lets start with it then

> This is great!  Time for me to figure out why that test is failing.

Cool - at the same time I will try to complete the branding and then
move on to the release parts of maven

Cheers!

>
> Scott
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Curt Arnold <carnold@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Receivers depends on Component, so I would think Component would be the
>> first to push.
>>
>>
>> On Aug 16, 2011, at 5:30 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>
>> > Chainsaw needs a companions release - which one exactly?
>> >
>> > Now the poms are in a "ok" state, means they are cleaned up but not
>> > 100% functional. Now its time to choose the first companion, fix the
>> > branding and try to make a release of it.
>> >
>> > Scott, seems it is christmas already :-)
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>>
>
>



-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message