logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [companions] Which ones for chainsaw?
Date Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:36:52 GMT
Thanks Christian!!

I agree, component makes sense because of the dependencies.

This is great!  Time for me to figure out why that test is failing.

Scott

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Curt Arnold <carnold@apache.org> wrote:

> Receivers depends on Component, so I would think Component would be the
> first to push.
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2011, at 5:30 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
> > Chainsaw needs a companions release - which one exactly?
> >
> > Now the poms are in a "ok" state, means they are cleaned up but not
> > 100% functional. Now its time to choose the first companion, fix the
> > branding and try to make a release of it.
> >
> > Scott, seems it is christmas already :-)
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>

Mime
View raw message