logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ralph Goers (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (LOG4J2-5) Appenders, Layouts and other back-end classes should be independent of logging API
Date Sat, 15 May 2010 06:59:46 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-5?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12867820#action_12867820
] 

Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-5:
----------------------------------

In my experimental branch LogEvent is an interface. The Layout, Filter and Appender interfaces
all use the LogEvent interface.

> Appenders, Layouts and other back-end classes should be independent of logging API
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-5
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-5
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Appenders
>            Reporter: Curt Arnold
>
> Appenders and related classes should be able to work on a logging event interface and
not be tied to a specific logging API and its native LoggingEvent class.  The logging event
interface should be readily implementable as a thin wrapper around established logging events
such as o.a.l.spi.LoggingEvent and java.util.logging.LogRecord.  log4j 2.0 appenders should
be usable as java.util.logging.Handler's with a simple adapter.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org


Mime
View raw message