logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Curt Arnold <carn...@apache.org>
Subject Re: log4j 2.0 code review process
Date Tue, 25 May 2010 05:21:59 GMT

On May 24, 2010, at 12:08 PM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:

> Den 24/05/10 08.54, Ralph Goers skrev:
>> BTW  - If I didn't say it before, this is the one place that git would be helpful.
 You could fork the code and do what you like and I could merge back what I like, etc.  I
don't really find git all that much more compelling for development once you have a trunk
being co-developed, unless you change the development model to one where everyone works on
their own fork and then merges back.  While you can do this with SVN, git makes this really
> This would perhaps be a good time to switch to a distributed SCM to avoid the reliance
on a central server?  This I would personally think is a good idea.
> There is no clear consensus on Stack Overflow on which one of bzr, git and hg to use,
and I have no personal preference, except that good IDE support would be nice.

There is some support for git at http://www.apache.org/dev/git.html, http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
and http://git.apache.org.  Unless someone wants to beat me to it, I'll request git mirroring
for log4j tomorrow.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org

View raw message