logging-log4j-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r943816 [1/9] - in /logging/log4j/branches/BRANCH_2_0_EXPERIMENTAL/rgoers: ./ log4j12-api/ log4j12-api/src/ log4j12-api/src/main/ log4j12-api/src/main/java/ log4j12-api/src/main/java/org/ log4j12-api/src/main/java/org/apache/ log4j12-api/sr...
Date Fri, 14 May 2010 13:12:57 GMT

On May 14, 2010, at 2:01 AM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:

> Den 14/05/10 09.22, Ralph Goers skrev:
>> 2. I don't like the way Logback binds to the implementation. I used a technique I
had used in a previous logging framework and used a file to define the implementation class.
In theory, the API could be modified to support multiple logging implementation simultaneously,
although I have no plans to implement that.
> You mean slf4j binding to logback?

Technically, SLF4J binding to any implementation. But yes, Logback is usually the implementaion.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org

View raw message