Mailing-List: contact log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Log4J Developers List" <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of java4dev@gmail.com designates
 209.85.134.191 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=vcUCpNXlNm8HBrSgozPbq0ix+cUSn3T/wBaZv51q7lajWU8vckfqNgFJI4R+vo0FsC
         eemjWYgvITo4vk+hmSlYVJWUT2hkS02e6zOSpRzCNu5+U5kCXA4nmBTfzZ4CFRJSpE1U
         20UxPcWRogLIWSi5LGWT5oBxJpd6kPbwHm9Pw=
Message-ID: <486F84E8.6070003@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:27:52 +0300
From: Java House <java4dev@gmail.com>
Reply-To: java4dev@gmail.com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: log4j-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: static logger
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello,

I need to log in different files based on thread group.
So I created my own RepositorySelector which supports exactly this 
scenario but in order for this to work I cannot have
static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger("X");

because the last instance that is created is setting the logger object 
and this is not the desired result.
I  have to use
Logger logger = Logger.getLogger("X");

but I have seen in so many places recomendations against such usage.
How bad is it, to NOT use static logger;

Considering the feature request would such a solution be acceptable;

thank you


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org