DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38125>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38125
------- Additional Comments From carnold@apache.org 2006-01-04 23:09 -------
The Object[] or Object... forms were not desirable on the debug level since they still incur
an array creation
cost in the typical case of debug not being enabled. For the info and higher levels, they
may be tolerable
since they would not be called nearly as frequently and those levels are commonly enabled.
I don't have a problem with parameterized messages, I think it is much cleaner if they are
on a different
class and not Logger which would allow the user to choose which formatter to be used (MessageFormat
or
the JDK 1.5's java.util.Formatter) and may allow some better options supporting JDK 1.5 varargs.
I think
the right time to discuss the issue is in the log4j 1.3 API review which would follow the
current
compatibility push.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
|